Monday, March 15, 2010

Blog 4 - Summary of Article 3

This essay emphasises on the importance of having a good leader to be in charge of the negotiations at the Copenhagen conference on Climate. Unfortunately, the host country, Denmark, is unlikely to take the leadership role for the conference as they do not have a suitable candidate for the job. However, the conference needs a well established leader who is just, dynamic, dedicated and knowledgeable on the topic of the debate. Some of the experienced lead negotiators quoted by the writer are Jean-Maurice Ripert, Tommy Koh and Angela Merkel. Ripert is known as someone who is optimistic and well aware of the needs of other delegates. On top of that, he even went the extra mile in understanding the thinking of delegates by consulting them privately. As for Koh, he commanded daily results of the conference from the delegates and take the full responsibility when he sense that an area was not going to succeed. As demonstrated by Ripert, a lead negotiator should take responsibility in declaring consensus which has been reached throughout the conference and at the same time justify it. To conclude, the qualities and capabilities shown by Merkel, Ripert and Koh are some of the examples that a good leader should have.

1 comment:

  1. The start of the essay gives a very good starting phrase that would want to make the reader read more. It tells the reader of situation which in this case was, "the conference needs a well established leader and such". However it would be better if you include as to why the need for such an established leader at the conference.

    The summary also give good examples of 3 such experienced lead negotiators with their characters and details of their examples. However, only 2 were explained out of the 3. So maybe it'll be better to explain all the 3 that you have mentioned earlier.

    The summary would be better if you have paragraphs the introduction, body and conclusion. So reader will know where is the introduction and when is the conclusion.

    Overall, i would say the summary is well written with the conclusion linking back to the main title at the start of the summary. Great!

    ReplyDelete